Criticism is natural, and every genius of art is aware of it.
The imaginative power of the creators like poets, novelists or dramatists undergoes various transformations throughout their lifetime. But nobody knows when criticism was allowed to occupy an independent place in art.
However, it is purely understandable that criticism and creation are two completely different features.
A critic is ready to judge a work of art, whereas a creator works hard to empower his imagination into reality. For example, a good author is an astounding genius who can produce many valuable literary works. But before being a genius, he is a journeyman of letters.
Now, criticism is different from literature. But a notion is always alive that criticism and literature go hand in hand. And so judging a work of art is nothing but evaluating the essence of a creator’s ideology, reflecting in his words.
When did humans first put every work of art in the category of an inevitable part of criticism?
Well, there is no specific time-frame that can be identified as the period to define the beginning of criticism. Also, no hard and fast rule can be applied to locate that period.
For a critic, criticism means analyzing creative art. To him, it is an effective way to find the most satisfying answers to those questions associated with that art.
A critic of a literary work aims to understand the actual creative mood of a writer. He tries to identify the complex ideas and emotions existing at the ultimate core of that work. And criticism is a process to find out that ideological place which acts as the origin of it.
Some people see it as a divine work that reveals a thousand ways to create more meaningful artistic content. In a word, criticism of literature helps to create a platform on which the creator can build a more appealing literary content.
Critics analyze the cause of enjoyment.
Like other human beings, critics first reflect upon their enjoyment and simultaneously analyze the reasons for it. Now, analyzing those reasons gives them the purpose to trace those qualities that can satisfy their hunger for queries. Through this, a critic can identify whether an author’s success is more or less conspicuous.
Moreover, when a critic has an introspective nature, that means he has the eyes for an inward introspection.
And an inward introspection explores sensible approaches to see why a journeyman of letters raises questions in his mind.
